Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole case vs. Texas HB2 Abortion Law

January 12, 2016 The Supreme Court, on March 2 will hear the Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole case. The case is one of its own in the 20 years. It looks at restrictive Texan law on pregnancy termination, stating it is unconstitutional and poses undue burden on females. With pregnancy ending clinics shutting down due to inability of maintaining ambulatory services and admitting privileges, many people are opting to http://www.leonpharmacy.com/abortion-pill.html. The black alley terminations too may increase, and females may face harsh health conditions. Provision of limit to pregnancy ending depending upon the viability of the fetus between 24 to 28 weeks, is also present. Illegal terminations would raise the mortality rate among pregnant woman seeking to end her pregnancy. If they do not get medical care in time, women whose life is threatened by the pregnancy may face death or complications. Though the Supreme Court has already legalized pregnancy termination in 1973, and women could take http://www.leonpharmacy.com/mifeprex.html without any restrictions, the Court had also allowed individual states to amend laws in noting safety of women during second and third trimester termination. Restrictions on Abortion across the States There are many states with restrictions placed on pregnancy termination in order to hinder women accessing the healthcare services, under pretext of safeguarding female’s health. HB2 law will be considered by the Court, as the opponents’ present argument on woman’s rights. • They say that admitting privileges in a clinic is very expensive and medically not needed if it is about dispensing Mifepristone tablets, which does not require surgical facilities or specifics on staffing, anesthesia, large doorway and rooms etc.

• Because of such restrictions, small sized clinics, which used to provide pregnancy termination care, have shut down, and more are to follow if HB2 is not revoked. The restrictions also serve political interests, as decision on pregnancy ending can mean defeat or victory in elections for a party.

• A large number of voters are pro-life, and the amount of pro-choice voters is comparatively less. If a political party in power does away with restrictions, then probably it will lose the elections and vice versa. Thus, there are contentions in abortion law, and political interest brewing underneath. HB2 Law: Opinions of Supporters and Opponents Supporters of Texas law say that it only wants woman’s health to be protected by bringing safety and health standards for pregnancy ending hospitals and clinics, so that emergency care medical facilities are present. But, opponents argue that the law has only intent of limiting access to pregnancy ending, and a provider named Whole Woman’s Health finds HB2 unnecessary and interfering in female’s care. • The court may put forward its decision probably in late June this year. If the Court rules against the Whole Woman’s Health, then Texan will have only 19 clinics running that offer pregnancy termination. The numbers have already come down from 42 prior to inaction of the state law. After California, Texas has the most amounts of population and about 800 miles long.

• Traveling from the remote regions will surely make care access a difficulty. Though U.S. has liberalized a lot many aspects, which as per Christianity is not viable, for e.g. gay marriages and legal marijuana, it has had not much progress with pregnancy terminations, as pro-life campaign picked up across the country.

• Women will have to travel long distances to get pregnancy terminated. Even then, they may not get appointment in time, which could increase risk to late term endings. Pregnancy terminated after the first trimester is very risky for a female. It could raise possibility of continuous heavy bleeding, vaginal infections, severe abdomen pain, and others.

Contact: 8007492968 Jennifer Miller www.leonpharmacy.com support@ leonpharmacy.com